*You think I will ask for the definition for "reality" from a linguist who is merely interested in word play ?* *I get my definition from a much greater person who has depth and seriousness. * *What is real comes before the dictionary was written, even before words were formed, even before "I am" or birth. *
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]>wrote: > real 1 |ˈrē(ə)l| > > adjective > > *1 *actually existing as a thing or occurring in fact; not imagined or > supposed *: Julius Caesar was a real person | a story drawing on real > events | her many illnesses, real and imaginary.* > > • used to emphasize the significance or seriousness of a situation or > circumstance *: there is a real danger of civil war | the competitive > threat from overseas is very real.* > > • Philosophy relating to something as it is, not merely as it may be > described or distinguished. > > *2 *(of a substance or thing) not imitation or artificial; genuine *: the > earring was presumably real gold.* > > • true or actual *: his real name is James | this isn't my real reason for > coming.* > > • [ attrib. ] (of a person or thing) rightly so called; proper *: he's my > idea of a real man | Jamie is my only real friend.* > > *3 *[ attrib. ] informal complete; utter (used for emphasis) *: the tour > turned out to be a real disaster.* > > *4 *[ attrib. ] adjusted for changes in the value of money; assessed by > purchasing power *: real incomes had fallen by 30 percent | an increase **in > real terms **of 11.6 percent.* > > *5 *Mathematics (of a number or quantity) having no imaginary part. See > *imaginary > *. > > *6 *Optics (of an image) of a kind in which the light that forms it > actually passes through it; not virtual. > > adverb [as submodifier ] informal > > really; very *: my head hurts real bad.* > > On 22 March 2011 12:31, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *The definition of real is "something which never changes". >> Since the manifestation always changes, I would call the unmanifested as >> real. >> * >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:20 AM, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> roomsearching wrote: >>> > What you people are calling as real is just the manifest world. >>> >>> is it not real enough for you? >>> >> *No, I refuse to call it as reality. * >> *Name and form are only recognized by a brain made of matter - which >> again rots in a 100 years. * >> >> >>> > Manifestation is observed by the manifest "I am". >>> >>> agreed >>> >>> > But the Absolute which supports the "I am" is unmanifested. The ego >>> itself >>> > is a manifestation and your egos think that the illusion is real. >>> > Manifestation = illusion = unreal. >>> >>> is it not real enough for you? >> >> *If name and form don't last, and all these arise only from the Absolute, >> why do you call it real ? >> Isnt the source real instead of the illusions created from the source ?* >> >> > > > -- > *mark ty wharton* > click the link and read > GURU<http://www.myebook.com/index.php?option=ebook&id=12255> > _____________________________________________________ > ______________________________________ The contents of this email and the > context of the message and any attachments are intended for the recipient > only. > You may not copy, or redistribute the contents of this email without the > express, written consent of the author. > > *mark ty-wharton is a composer, philosophical speaker and writer* > *http://mark.ty-wharton.com > @mark_tywharton <http://twitter.com/mark_tywharton>* > >
