On 3/26/2011 1:00 AM, Mark Ty-Wharton wrote:
On 25 Mar 2011, at 16:18, Sandeep-Kuber Technologies
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 3/25/2011 6:29 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton wrote:
How can you be so sure about this?
You asked...
Where do all these thoughts arise from and where do they get
hooked.
Do you mean the verbal thoughts in my head?
No.
The thought that there is something as a head to have verbal thoughts
in it.
Instead of rushing to the key board....flush the IPhone/laptop/PC
down the commode...
..and ........remain in and with the question....be the very
question.....
.....who is it that knows that it knows not.
I love it you feel so sure you know the answer to this :-)
Could not flush down the IPhone, eh?
:-)
you have been asking me this for a year
Nope.
It's all you...
...the characters which teem your world, physical, cyber and other
worldly ...
..as well as all the questions that get posed.
and when I look behind the smoke and mirrors I pretend to be a me,
behind the wizard's curtain, I find the real me - the absolute
perhaps? in the terminology being used here - it becomes clear the me
I think of as me has a watcher and it has been experienced - it is
relaxing - even blissful - and behind that - I have no idea what THAT is?
Now forget all that baloney of "wizard's curtains" and "the real me",
"the absolute", "watcher"...et al...
...(all that is mere gathered knowledge in the form of words)...
... and remain with .....who is it that knows that "I have no idea what
THAT is".
are you suggesting it could be known?
It could be known, it cannot be know, both assertions assume a state of
not-knowing which can or cannot reach knowing.
Ergo, both assertions, mere dancing of thought.
So "clever-Mark-who-just cannot let go of his IPhone" would ask the
profound question, so it is not in the realm of thought.
"Not in the realm of thought" is itself a creation of thought.
So, neither knowing, neither the absence of knowing <==>flushing down
the Iphone
and being still with the question,
....for whom is the very question of relevance.
I could call it God or the real self or the absolute or the void or
any number of things and not taking the bait on that one I am afraid
because it spoils it and takes us right back where we started!
Apperception(to use another silly word).....wipes out all calling..
...including the very wiping.
