the nectar IS the emptiness! Sent from an iPhone
On 23 Apr 2011, at 14:55, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: > nectar's not such a bad thing, > > it sure beats emptiness...... > > On Apr 22, 8:43 pm, Sandeep-Kuber Technologies > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 4/23/2011 6:21 AM, godszen wrote: >> >>> Gurubuster wrote: >>>>>> You, that you truly are. >>>>>> You, that you truly are......which has none other.... >>>>>> .. not even the soup-bowl of notions, known as GZ. >>>>> and what am I ? >>>> Remain with this. >> >>>> In silence. >>> there are no questions here..... >> >>> only vibrating nectarous bliss >> >> :-) >> >> It seems all the responses on this thread have only been questions. >> But never mind. >> >> Since you are able to report on this "vibrating nectarous bliss", you >> have been able to conceptualize it, define it..... >> >> .....which needs the vibrating jelly-belly to have been noticed , >> cognized, experienced. >> >> As so. >> >> Which makes it a projection of the known about vibratory jujubes.... >> >> ...a time bound phenomenon. >> >> A passing cloud. >> >> Now get over it. >> >> The sense of vibration is the sense of movement. >> >> The sense of movement is the sense of change. >> >> Consequent with the sense of change.... >> >> ....lo behold the array of the perceived, whether in the realm of the >> mental, emotional >> >> or physical.... these distinctions itself being, a sense of such a >> distinction, >> >> as really there are no such distinctions. >> >> And whether the array of the perceived is stationary or vibratory. >> >> All the above prattling maybe accepted, agreed, not-accepted, disagreed. >> >> None of all that is of any import. >> >> For, if a point at which the notion in the form of an object known as GZ >> itself cannot be isolated... >> >> .. whose acceptance/agreement/rejection/disagreement can be isolated? >> >> And thus be of any import? >> >> This display is not about convincing somebody by somebody else. >> >> This is not about a clincher rejoinder in an argument, which cannot be >> refuted. >> >> This is an invitation of the sudden clarity(to use a hackneyed phrase)... >> >> .... which seizes the rush to the key board to type out more baloney.... >> >> .....an invitation of the apperception of the discontinuity.....which is >> not the opposite of the continuous..... >> >> ...and just to be with these squiggly signs on a PC screen. >> >> The invitation to be......as the very apperceiving......that there is no >> loci-other-than-oneself, >> >> ...where such a beingness-as-oneself .... itself can get pegged. >> >> The invitation to be with some more squiggly signs on a PC screen at: >> >> http://www.the-covenant.net/poth105.htm >> >> http://www.the-covenant.net/poth51-a.htm >> >> http://www.the-covenant.net/poth93.htm
