nectar's not such a bad thing, it sure beats emptiness......
On Apr 22, 8:43 pm, Sandeep-Kuber Technologies <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/23/2011 6:21 AM, godszen wrote: > > > Gurubuster wrote: > >>>> You, that you truly are. > >>>> You, that you truly are......which has none other.... > >>>> .. not even the soup-bowl of notions, known as GZ. > >>> and what am I ? > >> Remain with this. > > >> In silence. > > there are no questions here..... > > > only vibrating nectarous bliss > > :-) > > It seems all the responses on this thread have only been questions. > But never mind. > > Since you are able to report on this "vibrating nectarous bliss", you > have been able to conceptualize it, define it..... > > .....which needs the vibrating jelly-belly to have been noticed , > cognized, experienced. > > As so. > > Which makes it a projection of the known about vibratory jujubes.... > > ...a time bound phenomenon. > > A passing cloud. > > Now get over it. > > The sense of vibration is the sense of movement. > > The sense of movement is the sense of change. > > Consequent with the sense of change.... > > ....lo behold the array of the perceived, whether in the realm of the > mental, emotional > > or physical.... these distinctions itself being, a sense of such a > distinction, > > as really there are no such distinctions. > > And whether the array of the perceived is stationary or vibratory. > > All the above prattling maybe accepted, agreed, not-accepted, disagreed. > > None of all that is of any import. > > For, if a point at which the notion in the form of an object known as GZ > itself cannot be isolated... > > .. whose acceptance/agreement/rejection/disagreement can be isolated? > > And thus be of any import? > > This display is not about convincing somebody by somebody else. > > This is not about a clincher rejoinder in an argument, which cannot be > refuted. > > This is an invitation of the sudden clarity(to use a hackneyed phrase)... > > .... which seizes the rush to the key board to type out more baloney.... > > .....an invitation of the apperception of the discontinuity.....which is > not the opposite of the continuous..... > > ...and just to be with these squiggly signs on a PC screen. > > The invitation to be......as the very apperceiving......that there is no > loci-other-than-oneself, > > ...where such a beingness-as-oneself .... itself can get pegged. > > The invitation to be with some more squiggly signs on a PC screen at: > > http://www.the-covenant.net/poth105.htm > > http://www.the-covenant.net/poth51-a.htm > > http://www.the-covenant.net/poth93.htm
