Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 14:20 -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Perrin Harkins wrote:
Are you talking about separate pools of interpreters perl vhost? Is
that really working?
I donn't think is works yet as this need will use the perlchild MPM which
isn't finished and isn't currently being actively developed by httpd.
Not quite. It does "work" even with the prefork mpm. But there are issues.
If I say something like "Improved isolation of servers for easier use in
ISPs" is that overstating it? My concern is that an ISP would ask us
about this after seeing the release and we'd look foolish saying, "well,
it doesn't really work well enough to use yet."
Separate pools of interpreters per vhost work, but it has no relation to
the ISPs whose problem is a secure separation between users. But perchild
(and its equivalents) aren't there yet, though it has nothing to do with
mod_perl (it's on the apache playground). Though I've heard that metux
mpm[1] is used by some people in production. I haven't tried it, so I
can't tell if it works under mod_perl.
[1] http://www.metux.de/mpm/en/?patpage=
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]