David Grove wrote:
> > Perl.com?  Why do people never suggest this?
> > Do we fear that O'Reilly's interest in and commitment to Perl is not
> > single-minded?
> 
> They are good advocates, but only
> if you don't compete with them.

So you're saying that because perl.com is hosted by oreilly,
it should be eschewed as a Perl PoP?

-- 
John Porter

Just another perky hacker.

Reply via email to