Re: Need some Help with Advocacy re: Java vs. Perl

[David Grove]

I'm not saying anything of the sort. I'm just saying that there seems to be
such a tight relationship between the high profile commercial perl entities
to question (not accuse, just question) the violation of anti-trust laws. As
a direct competitor of this alliant entity, I've seen some things that don't
look kosher. I will _not_ detail this at this time or in this forum. It is
not the place for it.

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Need some Help with Advocacy re: Java vs. Perl


> David Grove wrote:
> > > Perl.com?  Why do people never suggest this?
> > > Do we fear that O'Reilly's interest in and commitment to Perl is not
> > > single-minded?
> >
> > They are good advocates, but only
> > if you don't compete with them.
>
> So you're saying that because perl.com is hosted by oreilly,
> it should be eschewed as a Perl PoP?
>
> --
> John Porter
>
> Just another perky hacker.
>
>