> So why can't Perl be a better tool for XML jobs? Is this something the > Perl core developers should be looking into? We certainly see a huge > demand for XML and it is continuing to build. Just some thoughts:-- XML requires Unicode, hence Java got a head start. W3C is pushing very hard towards reference implementations in Java. It is quite safe to start using a reference implementation, since later there will be much better, but all compatible, commercial implementations available. -- Johan
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Chris Nandor
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Madeline Schnapp
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Rodney Clang
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Peter Scott
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Chris Nandor
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Rodney Clang
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Johan Vromans
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Madeline Schnapp
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? abigail
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Johan Vromans
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Nathan Torkington
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Madeline Schnapp
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Chris Nandor
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Nathan Torkington
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Chris Nandor
- Re: Useage of Perl up or down? Mark-Jason Dominus
