Agreed. Sorry Chris and Nathan. :) -----Original Message----- From: Nathan Torkington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the Perl community) Chris Nandor writes: > > Chris, you are so totally wrong. > > No I'm not. *shrug* This is what happens when a list owner lets the list go. Folks, let's try to bring this back to earth. Either work on concrete plans to promote Perl, or take your conversation off list. This goes for the discussion about Perl in business as much as for "yes you are, no I'm not". Thanks, Nat
- Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the Perl community... Selena Sol
- Re: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the Perl ... Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the Perl ... Chris Nandor
- Re: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the Perl ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the Perl ... Rodney Clang
- RE: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the Perl ... Selena Sol
- RE: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the Perl ... Rodney Clang
- Re: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the Perl ... Chris Nandor
- Re: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the P... Rodney Clang
- Re: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the P... Andrew Simmons
- Re: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the Perl ... Lisa Nyman
- Re: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the P... Chris Nandor
- RE: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the Perl ... Selena Sol
- RE: Respecting your enemy (was Corrupting the P... Rodney Clang
