Chris, I am interested. I have "Meaning", M. Polanyi and H. Prosch, University of Chicago Press, 1975. It covers everything we argue about: from thought through art to myth and much more. Boris Shoshensky
-- "Chris Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nobody's interested in Michael Polanyi? I admit he doesn't have as large a following as his fellow polymath, Charles Peirce. Perhaps that's because he's not that bullish on explicit knowledge -- the kind transferable by signs and books and governed by hierarchies of authority. (like the committees of vetting experts invoked by both Francis and William) He's more concerned with unspeakable knowledge -- and with the learning that takes place within families or small workshops. Did he have much to say about the kind of arts that interest us? I don't know -- but I'll be looking it up. (and it turns out that the Polanyi Society is coming to Chicago in June, so maybe I'll ask them) _____________________________________________________________ Need cash? Click to get an emergency loan, bad credit ok http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2211/fc/Ioyw6ijlfjD37pM08mIKCappI4Jnqa wNSLUJo14NVbrM6epWkay052/ _____________________________________________________________ Click to get a free auto insurance quotes from top companies. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2221/fc/Ioyw6i4tyCB7uSdSLLUSwzXkUpSPSS JCbQoc9gEWK0prA1PrJwXaKo/
