I don't consider this to be an example of an ontological(origins) argument but a epistemological one (systems of knowing)
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:09:16 EDT > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: "An 'aesthetic experience' MAKES the work 'art'" > > I realize many listers hate to hear such cold and "artless" terms as > 'ontological'. But when they see and use a distinction between merely CALLING > something an XXX and its "BEING" XXX, they are into ontology.
