I thought it was settled many moons ago that art
can only be an opinion shared by some, but not all.
A science, it's not.

mando


On Jul 22, 2008, at 8:46 PM, Saul Ostrow wrote:

Actually I was willing to acknowledge that the same thing may belong to
multiple categories
So much for exclusive distinctions



From: Michael Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:43:07 -0400
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: "An 'aesthetic experience' MAKES the work 'art'"

I suspect after initially being very vexed by your foopgoom gambit,
Saul would say, "Hell, what you call 'foopgoom' is the same thing I
call 'art.' Now we can at least get past this inane distraction and
talk about the serious stuff.

Reply via email to