Grunt grungt gruntgrunt foohie grunt
Chair, Visual Arts and Technologies
The Cleveland Institute of Art
 



> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:16:58 EDT
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: "An 'aesthetic experience' MAKES the work 'art'"
> 
> In a message dated 7/23/08 7:05:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> 
>> "How would either of us go about showing the other was "wrong"?
>> 
>> Very simple. 'Art' has a history in  evolution of the development of
>> language
>> and selected by those forces by association with a bunch of related things.
>> 'foopgoom' has nothing of that, only someones creative ability to create
>> dead
>> order of letters.
>> Boris Shoshensky
>> 
>> Aw, shoot, Boris, do you have any idea how many locutions have been devised
> in your time, in the "arts",   that all but overnight became accepted as
> so-called "words" or phrases that "HAVE meaning"? 'Deconstruction', 'rap',
> 'nouveau
> roman', 'theater of the absurd'. 'post-modernism', 'sit-com', 'truthiness',
> 'bee-bop', 'noir', 'post-structuralism', and on and on.
> 
> When did each of these "become" a "word"? Never. There came a time when some
> lexicologists, eager to look   au courant, included the locution in their
> dictionaries. More conservative lexicologists decided to hold off for a while.
> If,
> over time, the contemplation of the word stirred a roughly similar notion in
> what was in their judgment "enough" readers' minds, they put it in their
> dictionary -- and they concocted a "definition", which is no more than a
> lexicologist's attempt to describe the notion in the minds of people familiar
> with the
> usage of the location. Your notion that it then "IS" a word is naive
> "ontology".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **************
> Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for
> FanHouse Fantasy Football today.
> 
> (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.

Reply via email to