Enough -- Is enough Might we look at this as an aesthetic issue - a question of how information is ordered and then in some manner realized Seemingly we are dealing with an asymmetry - a economy of surplus and incompleteness - each signifier has multiple signifies - to wield these signifiers with any precision requires great skill because there is no direct correlation between thought and language - yet this is confused by the fact that the general conception that there is - Now if we are all willing to admit this we in a manner move beyond it because this little group does not share the general misconception - it is wiser and understands that their are multiple language built into the one we speak - this group has another set of rules that acknowledges the problems of using language - consequently we tend to be relaxed with one another using short hand - it is my perception Cheers does not believe that we should be relaxed , but should approach each other in our quiries as if we might be doing philosophy - which means rgor - and self consciousness - it would require that we express ourselves through specifics - that is try to construct where we may clear propositions illustrated with examples - as such we may no longer chat but enter into discourse - no longer offer up opinions and observations but offer up arguments - and constantly be vigilant least we fall into the abyss that opens beneath those who are lax -
Consequently let us see if the present inquiry actually concerns Cheers' ability to understand - or is it his ability to comprehend the difference that we are asking him to demonstrate - because I do agree he it is unfair to ask him to explain his understanding of something - but I do believe he can offer up an example of his comprehension in a rigorous manner if we are only clear as to what we are asking of him or something like that
