Missed that this question was specifically about when cheers sees something and then comprehends it then a question concerning did he believe in general that there was a divid that could not be overcome Chair, Visual Arts and Technologies The Cleveland Institute of Art
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:11:58 EDT > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>, > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: "An 'aesthetic experience' MAKES the work 'art'" > > > In a message dated 7/27/08 1:34:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >> My response would have been that cognition is more complex than that and >> that without some degree of self-reflection one might not even be aware that >> they have seen something >> >> I will leave it to Kate to determine if this in some manner reflects her >> inquiry >> >> > That is a reasonable response to the question. Sometimes, however, one is > aware of the mmoment when you understand what is being seen-the appearance of > the thing is the same, the eyes are the same, and all of a sudden something > shifts and the appearance of the thing takes on meaning. Something happens, > it > is clearly connected to the physical eyes and the thing and also to the > person doing the seeing. > KAte Sullivan > > > ************** > Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign > up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. > > (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020) > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean.
