Geoff
You
You could claim that I should have responded, that almost all other people respond but I'm not clear how you could infer a response from me. You could infer that water will freeze at 32 degrees F but that's not subjectively mediated.

Me
When did I say you "should" have responded?

You
I wrote that you "could say" not "did say". Yes, you didn't say/ write I "should have responded".

I realized that after I sent the message, but I still am confused about when I stated that someone else can infer your response.

On another subject: I understand the nature of a representation to include the quality (whatever might be intended by that term) as an aspect inherent in the nature of the representation. Are you implying something like the nature of a representation being op art as opposed to abstract realism?

I don't understand your question. Is there a typo in it ("being op art")? And what do you mean by "abstract realism"?


| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to