On Jan 16, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Michael Brady wrote:

Your meaninglessness is based on detaching the signified from the signifier, "meaning" from the word, disassembling the word and reassembling it as you wish into a pun, an inexplicable association, or a new form altogether.

I skipped a step. As I understand what you say, you use "meaningless" to indicate that there is no predetermined signified for any potential signifier, such as a painting. It's "meaningless" until the viewer provides the meaning. That's the detaching I was thinking of, so that my punning is an act of arbitrarily switching signifieds, changing the "meaning," whereas your paintings are signifiers waiting to have a signification adjoined to them.


| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
[email protected]

Reply via email to