So you are a follower of Maritain?
WC

--- On Fri, 1/16/09, Michael Brady <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Michael Brady <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Work creates the taste
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, January 16, 2009, 2:18 PM
> William:
> 
> > All that Catholic learning is responsible for your
> habit to explain  
> > the mysterious as if it were causal -- or something
> like what you  
> > said.  In other words, what you say might be true,
> true enough to  
> > reveal its falsity.
> 
>  From causality to casuistry? Nah. I'm using a razor
> here, trying to  
> scrape away all that can be properly explained by causal
> arguments.  
> Then we're left with marvels. We go from causality to
> splendor! <g>
> 
> I think that the intricacies of the natural world are
> marvels that are  
> almost inexhaustible, and that emanence of the marvelous
> suffuses  
> every experience. I think the rather common reaction of
> going from  
> seemingly inexplicable event--such as how blood clots or
> how a few  
> lines on a white square can "become" some
> representation--to asserting  
> the presence of some "mysterious" operation or
> force is a shortcut  
> around the true marvel of knowing how it happens.
> 
> Everything is marvelous.
> 
> How is it that I can look at a photograph taken in the 30s
> or 50s and  
> recognize my parents or my one-year-old brother? How does
> our brains  
> work to cause that? It may be subconscious, in the sense
> that such a  
> think happens outside of our conscious awareness, but that
> doesn't  
> mean it's invisible or unknowable.
> 
> I marvel at number. The unity of one. The duality of two.
> And then  
> there is three, and what comes after them.
> 
> I marvel at the cleverness of the clinical studies that
> reveal or  
> discern behavioral mechanisms.
> 
> I marvel at the odd coincidence that the electromagnetic
> spectrum goes  
> in a "linear" progression of wavelengths from
> infrared to ultraviolet,  
> which is the exact progress of the color wheel **and it
> circles back  
> on itself**!! I find that to be such a perplexing
> recurrence, kind of  
> like a rising canon in music.
> 
> And language. And words. The nature or quality of
> individual  
> preferences. On and on.
> 
> 
> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
> Michael Brady
> [email protected]

Reply via email to