There is no procedure for testing the existence of good art -- so the only thing more foolish than questioning the rational cause for such a belief (Cheerskep) is attempting to defend it (Brady). (and please! - can't we all cease appealing to the "the normal uses of language?)
William has asserted that "nothing you can say about it (good art) is untrue. It supports every theory." But the good art , as recognized by each believer, supports some theories more than others -- and those are the connections worth exploring. (specific works -- specific believers -- specific theories) ____________________________________________________________ Improve your driving ability with a stop at traffic school. Click now! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxXvt6PnsD4oVaZzLmkh7uB5U qzSfgSbW9YsHcHxDzGSDJ8ECHRP6Q/
