On Mar 4, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Chris Miller wrote:
There is no procedure for testing the existence of good art --
They why do you keep proposing some kind of test for taste, aesthetic
sensibility, etc.? Aren't those things (taste, aesthetic sensibility)
proxies or stalking horses of "good art"?
so the only
thing more foolish than questioning the rational cause for such a
belief
(Cheerskep) is attempting to defend it (Brady). (and please! -
can't we all
cease appealing to the "the normal uses of language?)
Why? Do you have a disagreement with "the normal uses of language"?
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
[email protected]
