>Its a dialogic and synergetic model - it is what allows a work to exceed its
times ("Art is the material (visual) assemblage that results form a
non-disciplinary
modeling of experience, data, information, and knowledge")
As well as the reverse. (Just because something is different doesn't mean
it's any better.)
But isn't allowed/not allowed a dead issue by now, anyway?
Hasn't it been beaten to death for at least 100 years?
What's needed is a model for *enabled* -- and that's where some notion of
discipline can be important.
*****************************************************************************
******************************
BTW -- within 24 hours William, our advocate of rigorous logic, has written:
"in the case of art, all claims are equal"
followed soon after by:
"Some claims can be stronger than others"
Not that logic can always be applied to questions of art and aesthetics,
but if A = B, then A cannot be stronger or weaker than B.
____________________________________________________________
Click here to light up your life with a love spell!
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxPPLl50IjlIITQYu1t1Ph72I
hGvRcBdpZK5hMvabBSqlBKk9PH5te/
