I don't have problem with "non-disciplinary" as a freedom of imagination and
expression. The trick is that freedom can't exist without some kind of
traditions, practices and languages of art-making.
Boris Shoshensky
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Facture
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:07:44 -0700 (PDT)

I like it because by saying "non-disciplinary" you imply that the work does
not directly engage the traditional questions, practices, and language of a
discipline.  That means that art may not engage the traditions, practices and
languages of art-making.  Fine with me.  Why?  Because art is not any specific
object, discipline, practice, tradition, etc., but is a particular relation
between something and the experiencing mind.  What that particular relation
is, or whether it can be regarded as separate from the stream of consciousness
or a special quality of it is, or seems to be, an unbounded aesthetic topic.
wc



________________________________
From: Saul Ostrow <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Chris
Miller <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:48:53 AM
Subject: Re: Facture

How do you like this proposition
Art is the material (visual) assemblage that results form a non-disciplinary
modeling of experience, data, information, and knowledge


On 9/30/09 9:40 AM, "Chris Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:

If , as William says, "A claim is a claim  and in the case of art, all claims
are equal", then no claims are " universally validated by history, art, or
practice", and  the absence of  such  validation is irrelevant.

If you disagree with Mando's claim, all you can do is offer examples of
"machine made art" (as Mando defines it) which you would call good art.

But unfortunately, Mando's definition is "those who do very realistic work
without any skill in the doing of it"

And  how do you determine the  presence or absence of skill, if not by the
appearance of the results?

Which makes the discussion of "machine made" -- or really any other kind of
"facture" --- just another art-talk attempt to make a personal judgment sound
more important.

Mando doesn't like certain paintings and sculptures -- and since he's spent
fifty years designing things, it can be important to know what those are.

But his attempt to generalize those judgments with reference to "machine
made"
has gone nowhere.




____________________________________________________________
Click now for effective psoriasis treatment solutions.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxRUxwJZTI6je0BGMgPD1QMFh
SfuGauNpbcMh1nyexbTyN5fzI81PK/




--

Reply via email to