All claims for art identity are equal, meaning equally propositional. Some claims have more credence but they are still propositional. All people are created equal; some have more advantages than others.
My logic is air tight, Miller, air tight. Solid as granite, shining like gold; learned, insightful, weighty and sharp as honed steel. Don't draw your sword on me unless you are prepared to carry your head home in a basket. Swoosh! wc ________________________________ From: Chris Miller <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 2:25:28 PM Subject: Re: Facture >Its a dialogic and synergetic model - it is what allows a work to exceed its times ("Art is the material (visual) assemblage that results form a non-disciplinary modeling of experience, data, information, and knowledge") As well as the reverse. (Just because something is different doesn't mean it's any better.) But isn't allowed/not allowed a dead issue by now, anyway? Hasn't it been beaten to death for at least 100 years? What's needed is a model for *enabled* -- and that's where some notion of discipline can be important. ***************************************************************************** ****************************** BTW -- within 24 hours William, our advocate of rigorous logic, has written: "in the case of art, all claims are equal" followed soon after by: "Some claims can be stronger than others" Not that logic can always be applied to questions of art and aesthetics, but if A = B, then A cannot be stronger or weaker than B. ____________________________________________________________ Click here to light up your life with a love spell! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxPPLl50IjlIITQYu1t1Ph72I hGvRcBdpZK5hMvabBSqlBKk9PH5te/
