This may be true as a condition of something being art - but many things are made in the name of art that do not meet this standard - unless you wish to imply that even bad and derivative art is always one of a kind - in which case there is more of the latter than the former as such it being one of a kind unique to its maker is no distinction, nor of merit
On 10/9/09 12:31 PM, "William Conger" <[email protected]> wrote: > Aesthetic judgement aside, art is always one of a kind (unique). > mando --
