Aesthetic judgement does not insure good or bad art,
just good or bad Aesthetic judgement.
mando
On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:28 AM, Saul Ostrow wrote:
This may be true as a condition of something being art - but many
things are
made in the name of art that do not meet this standard - unless
you wish to
imply that even bad and derivative art is always one of a kind - in
which case
there is more of the latter than the former as such it being one of
a kind
unique to its maker is no distinction, nor of merit
On 10/9/09 12:31 PM, "William Conger" <[email protected]> wrote:
Aesthetic judgement aside, art is always one of a kind (unique).
mando
--
