On Oct 20, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Chris Miller wrote:
But all this discussion is really beside the point that both Mando
and
William continually wish to make -- i.e. that they are artists,
and therefore
should be appreciated for whatever they want to do, with no
explanation
necessary.
Chris
In my case, that is my goal. Absolutely
mando
And that's fine, there's nothing wrong with a good, healthy ego.
Chris
But for them to engage in the philosophy of art, they need to
question why
works, other than their own, should be considered profound,
important, unique,
or ineffable enough to be considered fine art.
Chris
I'm very broad in my idea of what fine art should be ( since fine
art,to me has no
"should be" Real Identity).
Profound, Important, Ineffable and even unique(though I favor unique)
are words
that take you on a subjective alley, where philosophers meet to
figure out how
give identity to subjectivism.
mando
