On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:41 AM, William Conger <[email protected]>wrote:
> > How can there be an art criticism, vested with an aesthetic position, that > does not recognize the simple fact that art is for the few, the monied, the > aristocratic, the despotic? - *If it is art, it is not for all*. If it is for all, it is not art. Schunberg
