No significant is a quantitative and qualitative measure rooted in categorical
differences (distinguishing characteristics) I.e. Those that are inherent and
defining all else is subjective and can not be formulated as a proposition
without the use of the pronoun I - as in I now know why ch. doesn't like my
telegraphic style

Sent from my iPhone
Please excuse grammar and spelling errors
Expect everything - fear nothing - or did I get that backwards
Saul ostrow
646 528 8537

On Jul 27, 2012, at 6:24 PM, ARMANDO BAEZA <[email protected]> wrote:

> I find a million differences in humans yet they all have two arms/two legs/
> One head /One chest /one lumbar region/ and a pelvis and two ears/
> two eyes/
> two nostrils ten finger and toes /Etc. to me those are the areas
> i can any
> express  or symbolize any meaning I wish with the the form,
> ab
> ________________________________
> From: Tom McCormack <[email protected]>
> To:
> [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 2:46 PM
> Subject: Re:
> is list dead?
>
> I wrote:
>
>> Also: My name and address differentiate me from
> anyone else in the world.
>> Would you call them my "essence"?
>
> Saul then
> advanced his description of his notion of 'essence' from "the
> essence of
> something being the minimal
>>
>> conditions that allow us to distinguish it
> from another thing" to
>
>> "the essence of something being the minimal
>>
> conditions that allow us to distinguish it from another thing (of a
>>
> different kind or order)."
>
> But Saul also wrote:
>>
>> If that combination is
> the most significant difference we might identify
>> then I would say yes
>
> This
> is troublesome because the whole game of coming up with this stipulative
> definition of 'essence' now rides on a person's notion of "significant". I
see
> a circle trembling on the horizon:
>
>> - though I do not think there is any
> essential
>> difference between one human and another - though there may be
> between the
>> quality of their life - this is why I chose a phenomenal rather
> than a
>> linguistic criteria - i.e. the essence of something being the minimal
>> conditions that allow us to distinguish it from another thing (of a
>>
> different kind or order) -
>
> An "essential difference" is needed to make
> something an essence. And how do
> we determine if something is "essential"? We
> see if it is "significant". And
> how do we determine if something is
> "significant"? Well, it's significant if
> it means something is of a "different
> kind or order". And how do we determine
> that? Well, it's of a different kind
> or order if it makes for a different
> essence. Oy.

Reply via email to