In a message dated 7/29/12 11:48:57 AM, [email protected] writes:

> To me , the essence of the human form is one that has
> been recognized on first glance from time immemorial.
> Tall / fat / thin /
> short / all / Races / old / young / even as
> a skeleton. And yet no two are alike,
> like snow flakes.
>
Realize, Mando, that others might dispute this. For one thing, it's unclear
how your notion of "form" differs from your notion of "essence". For
another they might say your notion of form is different from theirs -- e.g.
they
might say their idea of the form of that 700 pound lady who waq in the news
last week "differs essentially" from the form of Nicole Kidman or the form of
Mahatma Ghandi.   There may be underlying skeletal similarities, but the
"form" they are struck by, that commands their eye, is much more a result of
flesh than bone.

My own position is that such things as "essences" and "forms" are solely
mental inventions. You're entitled to your personal notion of "THE essence" of
something, but it does not "correspond to" some entity -- the thing you
call 'essence -- in the mind-independent world. When Saul says "I do not think
there is any essential difference between one human and another,"   my mind
shouts that it feels there is something very "essentially" different between
Ted Bundy and Mother Teresa, or between Adolf Hitler and Martin Luther
King.   I'm aware the response might come that they're all human beings, but I
reply that it's an arbitrary fiat, a mental figment, to declare that being of
the same species is more "essential" than whether or not one is a mass
murderer. When I consider a radical Muslim who wants to kill my wife and
children solely because they are infidels, that difference from me "feels"
(and
that's all we're talking about here) more essential than that the radical and
I
are both humans. Again: The alleged "essences" are totally mental
concoctions; so, though you're entitled to your own personal
evaluations/preferences/focuses, it's an error to talk of one thing's being
objectively, "really",
more "essential" than another.

Reply via email to