And what is the essence of the human form?

Sent from my iPhone
Please excuse grammar and spelling errors
Expect everything - fear nothing - or did I get that backwards
Saul ostrow
646 528 8537

On Jul 28, 2012, at 5:28 PM, ARMANDO BAEZA <[email protected]> wrote:

> I feel that the human form remains a human form reguardless how distorted 
> it is expressed,as long as the essence is maintain in the expression.
> 
> armando baeza
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Slostrow2
> <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 5:15 PM
> Subject:
> Re: is list dead?
> 
> What is the essential difference btwn a boulder and a
> pebble, btwn a humane
> and a primate
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> Please excuse grammar
> and spelling errors
> Expect everything - fear nothing - or did I get that
> backwards
> Saul ostrow
> 646 528 8537
> 
> On Jul 27, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Tom McCormack
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I wrote:
>> 
>>> Also: My name and address
> differentiate me from anyone else in the world.
>>> Would you call them my
> "essence"?
>> 
>> Saul then advanced his description of his notion of 'essence'
> from "the
>> essence of something being the minimal
>>> 
>>> conditions that allow
> us to distinguish it from another thing" to
>> 
>>> "the essence of something
> being the minimal
>>> conditions that allow us to distinguish it from another
> thing (of a
>>> different kind or order)."
>> 
>> But Saul also wrote:
>>> 
>>> If
> that combination is the most significant difference we might identify
>>> then
> I would say yes
>> 
>> This is troublesome because the whole game of coming up
> with this
> stipulative
>> definition of 'essence' now rides on a person's notion
> of "significant". I
> see
>> a circle trembling on the horizon:
>> 
>>> - though I
> do not think there is any essential
>>> difference between one human and
> another - though there may be between the
>>> quality of their life - this is
> why I chose a phenomenal rather than a
>>> linguistic criteria - i.e. the
> essence of something being the minimal
>>> conditions that allow us to
> distinguish it from another thing (of a
>>> different kind or order) -
>> 
>> An
> "essential difference" is needed to make something an essence. And how
> do
>> we
> determine if something is "essential"? We see if it is "significant".
> And
>> 
> how do we determine if something is "significant"? Well, it's significant
> if
>> 
> it means something is of a "different kind or order". And how do we
> determine
>> that? Well, it's of a different kind or order if it makes for a different
>> 
> essence. Oy.

Reply via email to