If all A (unity) is B (truth) and all B is C (beautiful) then all A is C. Circular. wc
----- Original Message ---- From: Michael Brady <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, August 1, 2012 8:36:45 AM Subject: Re: b My task is, above all, to make you see.b On Aug 1, 2012, at 9:26 AM, William Conger <[email protected]> wrote: > The vicious circle of the one-good-true-beautiful is ultimately meaningless because each term is used as the definition of the other. No, it's not circular. Unity is defined in itself, and then it is also described as a good thing, an aspect of beauty, and per se, true. Likewise, the true is defined in itself, and then is described as good, etc. This isn't circular reasoning. I think Thomas has something specifically about that. I'll have to scrounge around for a citation, though. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Michael Brady
