As an individual, the only thing I can share for debate and evaluation is my own creations,because my words often cause Misunderstanding.
Ab ________________________________ From: saul ostrow <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 10:59 AM Subject: Re: "...There can be no art criticism because there is no criteria from which to make criticism." and while this is nice for the individual - the collective requires a bit more than feelings if they are to work together - they need a shared purpose that they may evaluate and debate, rather than bicker over On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:38 PM, ARMANDO BAEZA <[email protected]>wrote: > I Always thought every thing under the sun > had the power within it's essence > to reflect > positive or negative feelings to the personal > experiences and > values of each mind. > > ab > > ________________________________ > From: William > Conger <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: > Monday, August 20, 2012 6:31 AM > Subject: Re: "...There can be no art criticism > because there is no criteria from which to make criticism." > > Another dumb > article, redundant and boring in itself. It ends with the vacuous > statement > that artworks convey meaning. > > An object, including a word or an artwork, > cannot 'convey' meaning. Meaning is > an invention of the mind. Things in > the world are meaningless. > wc > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: joseph > berg <[email protected]> > To: aesthetics-l <[email protected]> > Sent: > Mon, August 20, 2012 4:12:29 AM > Subject: "...There can be no art criticism > because there is no criteria from > which to make criticism." > http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=14006&page=0 > > -- S a u l O s t r o w *Critical Voices* 21STREETPROJECTS 162 West 21 St NYC, NY 10011 [email protected]
