if one seriously is concerned with communications - they will soon learn
through deed how to speak about something other than their self  - anything
less is narcissism

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:34 PM, ARMANDO BAEZA <[email protected]>wrote:

> As an individual, the only thing I can share for debate and evaluation
> is my
> own creations,because my words often cause Misunderstanding.
>
> Ab
> ________________________________
>  From: saul ostrow <[email protected]>
> To:
> [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 10:59 AM
> Subject:
> Re: "...There can be no art criticism because there is no  criteria from
> which
> to make criticism."
>
> and while this is nice for the individual - the
> collective requires a bit
> more than feelings if they are to work together -
> they need a shared
> purpose that they may evaluate and debate, rather than
> bicker over
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:38 PM, ARMANDO BAEZA
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > I Always thought every thing under the sun
> >
> had the power within it's essence
> > to reflect
> > positive or negative feelings
> to the personal
> >  experiences and
> > values of each mind.
> >
> > ab
> >
> >
> ________________________________
> >  From: William
> > Conger
> <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent:
> > Monday,
> August 20, 2012 6:31 AM
> > Subject: Re: "...There can be no art criticism
> >
> because there is no  criteria  from which to make criticism."
> >
> > Another dumb
> > article, redundant and boring in itself.  It ends with the vacuous
> >
> statement
> > that artworks convey meaning.
> >
> > An object, including a word or
> an artwork,
> > cannot  'convey' meaning.  Meaning is
> > an invention of the
> mind.  Things in
> > the world are meaningless.
> > wc
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original
> Message ----
> > From: joseph
> > berg <[email protected]>
> > To: aesthetics-l
> <[email protected]>
> > Sent:
> > Mon, August 20, 2012 4:12:29 AM
> >
> Subject: "...There can be no art criticism
> > because there is no criteria
> from
> > which to make criticism."
> >
> http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=14006&page=0
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> S a u
> l     O s t r o w
>
>
> *Critical     Voices*
> 21STREETPROJECTS
> 162   West    21 St
> NYC,  NY    10011
> [email protected]
>
>


-- 
S a u l     O s t r o w


*Critical     Voices*
 21STREETPROJECTS
162   West    21 St
NYC,  NY    10011
[email protected]

Reply via email to