AFAIK The Trango Lynx secret sauce was header compression, and those numbers vary based on your average packet size. Lets of small packets = less overall throughput / larger packets = larger overall throughput capability.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: > ubnt does not publish the specific FEC coding types and percentages for > the AF11's modulations. What it's doing under the hood is kind of opaque... > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This brings up what I've been wondering when looking at the AF11 data >> sheets: >> >> A Trango Lynx on a 56mhz channel SISO without compression yields 486mbps >> Full Duplex at 1024QAM. >> An AF11X SISO on the same channel size at 1024QAM yields 344mbps Full >> Duplex. >> >> What's the deal? Lower cyclic prefix on AF11? >> >> -Adam >> >> >> >> On 7/17/2018 2:28 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >> >> With limited spectrum, it's an accurate statement. On a single polarity, >> 56mhz channel an AF-11 will get slightly less throughput than something >> like an old SAF Lumina (and the AF11 is using 1024QAM vs 256QAM, to get not >> even as much capacity, which means it needs a higher link budget). However, >> if spectrum isn't a problem, you need to spend a lot more money to get >> similar throughput to either of these radios with anything else. >> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Neither radio has much better performance than a 10 year old >>> traditional 256 QAM radio. >>> >>> One should take that with a grain of salt !.... >>> In absolute terms, yes that could be an accurate statement. >>> How is pans out in reality is questionable ! >>> >>> :) >>> >>> Faisal Imtiaz >>> Snappy Internet & Telecom >>> http://www.snappytelecom.net >>> >>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 >>> >>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From: *"Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]> >>> *Sent: *Tuesday, July 17, 2018 1:36:15 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF-11FX vs B11 >>> >>> I don't have an incentive to use either as there is so little 11 GHz >>> spectrum in my area. >>> >>> >>> Neither radio has much better performance than a 10 year old traditional >>> 256 QAM radio. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Jason McKemie" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]> >>> *Sent: *Tuesday, July 17, 2018 12:32:20 PM >>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] AF-11FX vs B11 >>> >>> More dependable, predictable, etc. >>> I take it you like the B11? I like the radio interface and SFP on that >>> radio, I like just about everything else on the AF11. >>> >>> I've just read about several instances where people have replaced the >>> B11 with the AF11fx - I haven't read a single one the opposite way around. >>> I'd like to hear if you've had a different experience. >>> >>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Define "better". >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>>> >>>> >>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"Jason McKemie" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent: *Monday, July 16, 2018 8:02:34 PM >>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] AF-11FX vs B11 >>>> >>>> Does anyone have experience with both of these that can provide some >>>> guidance as to which has worked better? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
