It is outside at my NOC. We have a 10' x 10' structure on the roof with back to back Nanostations broadcasting 10' apart
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:27 AM, Cameron Crum <[email protected]> wrote: > The foil table is cheap and easy to try. If it doesn't work, you can > always peel it off. As for the 6db result from earlier, were you outdoors > in inside when you tried that test? > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I used to use galvanizing spray paint to repair stingers that had lost >> their gold stickers, and it worked great for that. I would clean the >> residue off, mask and spray the circle, and then paint the whole thing >> white. >> >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:59 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Galvanizing spray paint may not have a good faraday effect due to the >>> small zinc particle size and the lack of electrical connection between >>> particles. Just a guess. I would think foil tape would tell you for >>> certain. >>> >>> But the paint may have been just as good. Never really tested it for >>> that. I know that eventually the vehicle somehow weathers or evaporates >>> away and allows the zinc to do the proper electrochemistry when applied to >>> steel. >>> >>> *From:* Jeremy >>> *Sent:* Friday, July 27, 2018 10:55 AM >>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RF Armor for a CPE >>> >>> I have masked the front and painted the backs with galvanizing spray >>> paint, but the difference was not really very noticeable. I debated trying >>> foil tape, but just gave up frequency reuse on that old UBNT gear. >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:47 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I would have cost them just a penny or two to have coated the inside of >>>> the enclosure with aluminum deposition or nickel paint (or arc spray zinc) >>>> to have eliminated much of that. >>>> >>>> I wonder what the difference would be to put foil on everything but the >>>> area in the front where the antenna is... >>>> >>>> *From:* Jeremy >>>> *Sent:* Friday, July 27, 2018 10:43 AM >>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RF Armor for a CPE >>>> >>>> ....so it dropped from hearing at a -30 to a -36. Still too hot for >>>> them to both be on-channel obviously, since they put out so much noise out >>>> the back. Obviously a directional antenna like a Powerbeam will be >>>> different. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In my experience testing RF armor on a two Nanostations facing >>>>> opposite directions, ten feet apart from each other, each rf armor lowered >>>>> the noise level by 3db. So both of them lowered the level that they could >>>>> hear each other by 6db. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Jay Weekley < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> How effective is RF Armor in reducing interference being received by >>>>>> an SM? Obviously it depends on which direction it's coming from . >>>>>> -- >>>>>> *Jay Weekley* >>>>>> >>>>>> *Cyber Broadband * >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
