This was more of a discussion of the technical aspects of bonding using a remote router and the feasibility than a plan to implement, I know their are companies that offer routers with a 'cloud' bonding service, so I was curious if anyone has successfully implemented it with mikrotiks
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 1:43 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > Implementation issues aside, I can’t imagine trying to serve a 50M DIA > customer via DSL or LTE, much less DSL bonded with LTE. Neither seems like > an adequate service for that kind of customer. > > > > When you say 25M DSL, are you talking VDSL, or something like ADSL2 which > is probably already bonded to get that speed? > > > > I’m also thinking that with 2 totally different technologies like DSL and > cellular, with different latency and packet loss characteristics, you might > get away with per-destination load sharing but not per-packet. > > > > I usually think of “bonding” to mean something at layer 2, like ADSL > supports bonding 2 or more copper lines to increase speed. Or LAG. > > > > But of course the question will be academic in a few months when they can > get gigabit speeds on 5G. <insert tongue-in-cheek emoji) > > > > *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *TJ Trout > *Sent:* Thursday, October 25, 2018 3:17 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router > > > > mainly interested as a proof of concept, but say you have a customer who > needs 50m dia and you can only get 25m service (say DSL or LTE) I was > interested in bonding them to provide redundancy and bonding using a remote > mikrotik that can provide the tunneling and aggregation > > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 5:29 AM Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > > Trying to visualize the use. If there is fiber, is it not connected to > the world? > > This sounds like a way to cobble an upstream DIA and feed it into a > fiber. > > > > > > *From:* Dennis Burgess via AF > > *Sent:* Thursday, October 25, 2018 6:20 AM > > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > > *Cc:* Dennis Burgess > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router > > > > Depends on the technology, can you load balance, sure, bonding is a > different best and needs to be supported by your upstream.. > > > > > > *Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer * > > Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition” > > *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services > > *Office*: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net > > Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com > > > > *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *TJ Trout > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 24, 2018 10:27 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router > > > > Has anyone bonded wan interfaces using another mikrotik hosted elsewhere? > > > > I.e. bonding multiple LTE or DSL connections on the wan of a remote > mikrotik that is tunneled back to another router that has fiber? > > > > Best practices, what works? > ------------------------------ > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
