Yep, we do that with our data center and MT.  Its load balancing and failover 
more than “bonding”  bonding is a very strict thing, and like Ken said, LAG or 
MLPPP is about the only things you can do to create a true bond, but 99% of the 
time, when you look at it, bonding is NOT something that most people require, 
just load balancing and failover is fine with them.


Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com

From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of TJ Trout
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 3:56 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router

This was more of a discussion of the technical aspects of bonding using a 
remote router and the feasibility than a plan to implement, I know their are 
companies that offer routers with a 'cloud' bonding service, so I was curious 
if anyone has successfully implemented it with mikrotiks

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 1:43 PM Ken Hohhof 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Implementation issues aside, I can’t imagine trying to serve a 50M DIA customer 
via DSL or LTE, much less DSL bonded with LTE.  Neither seems like an adequate 
service for that kind of customer.

When you say 25M DSL, are you talking VDSL, or something like ADSL2 which is 
probably already bonded to get that speed?

I’m also thinking that with 2 totally different technologies like DSL and 
cellular, with different latency and packet loss characteristics, you might get 
away with per-destination load sharing but not per-packet.

I usually think of “bonding” to mean something at layer 2, like ADSL supports 
bonding 2 or more copper lines to increase speed.  Or LAG.

But of course the question will be academic in a few months when they can get 
gigabit speeds on 5G.  <insert tongue-in-cheek emoji)

From: AF <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of 
TJ Trout
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 3:17 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router

mainly interested as a proof of concept, but say you have a customer who needs 
50m dia and you can only get 25m service (say DSL or LTE) I was interested in 
bonding them to provide redundancy and bonding using a remote mikrotik that can 
provide the tunneling and aggregation

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 5:29 AM Chuck McCown 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Trying to visualize the use.  If there is fiber, is  it not connected to the 
world?
This sounds like a way to cobble an upstream DIA and feed it into a fiber.


From: Dennis Burgess via AF
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 6:20 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Cc: Dennis Burgess
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router

Depends on the technology, can you load balance, sure, bonding is a different 
best and needs to be supported by your upstream..


Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Create Wireless Coverage’s with 
www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com>

From: AF <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of 
TJ Trout
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 10:27 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router

Has anyone bonded wan interfaces using another mikrotik hosted elsewhere?

I.e. bonding multiple LTE or DSL connections on the wan of a remote mikrotik 
that is tunneled back to another router that has fiber?

Best practices, what works?
________________________________
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to