I have had mixed results doing this. The biggest issue is the latency and throughput need to be fairly similar or you run in to big issues. I have had success bonding multiple cable modems and DSL together. FYI these have all been done using two connections from the same provider. This is another problem all together because then you are likely to get two addresses on the same subnet with the same gateway. There are ways around that none too pretty and can change behavior from ROS version to ROS version.

On 10/25/2018 3:56 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
This was more of a discussion of the technical aspects of bonding using a remote router and the feasibility than a plan to implement, I know their are companies that offer routers with a 'cloud' bonding service, so I was curious if anyone has successfully implemented it with mikrotiks

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 1:43 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Implementation issues aside, I can’t imagine trying to serve a 50M
    DIA customer via DSL or LTE, much less DSL bonded with LTE. 
    Neither seems like an adequate service for that kind of customer.

    When you say 25M DSL, are you talking VDSL, or something like
    ADSL2 which is probably already bonded to get that speed?

    I’m also thinking that with 2 totally different technologies like
    DSL and cellular, with different latency and packet loss
    characteristics, you might get away with per-destination load
    sharing but not per-packet.

    I usually think of “bonding” to mean something at layer 2, like
    ADSL supports bonding 2 or more copper lines to increase speed. 
    Or LAG.

    But of course the question will be academic in a few months when
    they can get gigabit speeds on 5G.  <insert tongue-in-cheek emoji)

    *From:* AF <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> *On Behalf Of *TJ Trout
    *Sent:* Thursday, October 25, 2018 3:17 PM
    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router

    mainly interested as a proof of concept, but say you have a
    customer who needs 50m dia and you can only get 25m service (say
    DSL or LTE) I was interested in bonding them to provide redundancy
    and bonding using a remote mikrotik that can provide the tunneling
    and aggregation

    On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 5:29 AM Chuck McCown <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Trying to visualize the use.  If there is fiber, is  it not
        connected to the world?

        This sounds like a way to cobble an upstream DIA and feed it
        into a fiber.

        *From:*Dennis Burgess via AF

        *Sent:*Thursday, October 25, 2018 6:20 AM

        *To:*AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group

        *Cc:*Dennis Burgess

        *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router

        Depends on the technology, can you load balance, sure, bonding
        is a different best and needs to be supported by your upstream..

        *Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer *

        Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”

        *Link Technologies, Inc*-- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services

        *Office*: 314-735-0270  Website: http://www.linktechs.net
        <http://www.linktechs.net/>

        Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com
        <http://www.towercoverage.com>

        *From:*AF <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> *On Behalf Of *TJ Trout
        *Sent:* Wednesday, October 24, 2018 10:27 PM
        *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router

        Has anyone bonded wan interfaces using another mikrotik hosted
        elsewhere?

        I.e. bonding multiple LTE or DSL connections on the wan of a
        remote mikrotik that is tunneled back to another router that
        has fiber?

        Best practices, what works?

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- AF mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




--

Trey Scarborough
VP Engineering
3DS Communications LLC
p:9729741539

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to