I didn't take him to mean bonding DSL with LTE. I think he's saying
bonding two identical connections.
I get what you're saying about bonding vs load sharing.
I haven't done it, but I'm certain you could have two identical DSL
connections, make a tunnel from each one to your data center, then run
OSPF with equal cost load sharing across those two tunnels. You still
don't have more than 25meg on a speed test, but multiple connections in
aggregate could use 50meg. That's very easy if both connections perform
the same.
Mikrotik's wiki says you can run LAG on top of EoIP. I have never done
this, but apparently it's a thing that exists. The idea frightens me
and I don't know why.
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Bonding_Examples
On 10/25/2018 4:41 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Implementation issues aside, I can’t imagine trying to serve a 50M DIA
customer via DSL or LTE, much less DSL bonded with LTE. Neither seems
like an adequate service for that kind of customer.
When you say 25M DSL, are you talking VDSL, or something like ADSL2
which is probably already bonded to get that speed?
I’m also thinking that with 2 totally different technologies like DSL
and cellular, with different latency and packet loss characteristics,
you might get away with per-destination load sharing but not per-packet.
I usually think of “bonding” to mean something at layer 2, like ADSL
supports bonding 2 or more copper lines to increase speed. Or LAG.
But of course the question will be academic in a few months when they
can get gigabit speeds on 5G. <insert tongue-in-cheek emoji)
*From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *TJ Trout
*Sent:* Thursday, October 25, 2018 3:17 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router
mainly interested as a proof of concept, but say you have a customer
who needs 50m dia and you can only get 25m service (say DSL or LTE) I
was interested in bonding them to provide redundancy and bonding using
a remote mikrotik that can provide the tunneling and aggregation
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 5:29 AM Chuck McCown <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Trying to visualize the use. If there is fiber, is it not
connected to the world?
This sounds like a way to cobble an upstream DIA and feed it into
a fiber.
*From:*Dennis Burgess via AF
*Sent:*Thursday, October 25, 2018 6:20 AM
*To:*AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
*Cc:*Dennis Burgess
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router
Depends on the technology, can you load balance, sure, bonding is
a different best and needs to be supported by your upstream..
*Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer *
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
*Link Technologies, Inc*-- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
*Office*: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com
<http://www.towercoverage.com>
*From:*AF <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> *On Behalf Of *TJ Trout
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 24, 2018 10:27 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router
Has anyone bonded wan interfaces using another mikrotik hosted
elsewhere?
I.e. bonding multiple LTE or DSL connections on the wan of a
remote mikrotik that is tunneled back to another router that has
fiber?
Best practices, what works?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
