.....and knowing that our friends at Ubiquiti are on this list as well, I feel I should point out that they make a lot of useful products and that in spite of our trash talking it's likely that every single one of us has found a use for something Ubqiuiti in their network.

And maybe that multipoint LTU thing will rock our socks when it comes out in like 16 more years.


On 2/5/2019 10:18 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Hi we're Ubiquiti, and we don't suck nearly as bad as Tranzeo.

--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:13 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    SmartBridges
    WaveNet IP

    I'm not saying Ubiquiti is "high grade", but it's higher than
    some.  It's not a Ceragon IP20, but it's certainly a contender for
    the highest of the low grade.


    On 2/5/2019 5:10 PM, Colin Stanners wrote:
    Ubnt's AirFiber platform is great (as long as you don't need
    spatial diversity), I think we can all agree it's high-grade. But
    many of their other platforms suffer from the "let's develop
    random new products instead of fixing major bugs" issue so I
    wouldn't call them high-grade.

    What is definitely lower grade:
    -WRT54Gs in tupperware (still funny that this is how some WISPs
    started)
    -anything Tranzeo
    -Skypilot

    On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 3:21 PM Mathew Howard
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Can you get lower grade WISP equipment?

        On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:51 PM Adam Moffett
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            it's all relative

            On 2/5/2019 10:28 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
            "Most affected devices are high-grade WISP equipment"

            😂

            On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 9:23 AM Steve Jones
            <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                am i the only one who shuts off discovery?

                On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 8:25 AM Ken Hohhof
                <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                    Is it my imagination, or does that article veer
                    off toward the end into stuff that may not be
                    Ubiquiti problems at all?  And from the
                    description of the problem, I don’t see how it
                    would lead to radios being “defaced”, just used
                    as an amplifier via Ubiquiti Discovery Protocol.

                    *From:* AF <[email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>> *On Behalf Of
                    *Jaime Solorza
                    *Sent:* Monday, February 4, 2019 7:00 PM
                    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
                    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
                    *Subject:* [AFMUG] Over 485, 000 Ubiquiti
                    devices vulnerable to new attack | ZDNet

                    
https://www.zdnet.com/article/over-485000-ubiquiti-devices-vulnerable-to-new-attack/

-- AF mailing list
                    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
                [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



-- AF mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



-- AF mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to