Indeed... I think you could consider most of the airFiber products
high-grade.

But most of that other stuff is relatively ancient at this point... if
companies like Tranzeo are even still in business, I can't imagine who is
still using it, or why. When it comes to price, I don't think there's
really anything that can beat the low end Ubiquiti stuff.

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 9:25 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:

> .....and knowing that our friends at Ubiquiti are on this list as well, I
> feel I should point out that they make a lot of useful products and that in
> spite of our trash talking it's likely that every single one of us has
> found a use for something Ubqiuiti in their network.
>
> And maybe that multipoint LTU thing will rock our socks when it comes out
> in like 16 more years.
>
>
> On 2/5/2019 10:18 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>
> Hi we're Ubiquiti, and we don't suck nearly as bad as Tranzeo.
>
> --
> bp
> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:13 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> SmartBridges
>> WaveNet IP
>>
>> I'm not saying Ubiquiti is "high grade", but it's higher than some.  It's
>> not a Ceragon IP20, but it's certainly a contender for the highest of the
>> low grade.
>>
>>
>> On 2/5/2019 5:10 PM, Colin Stanners wrote:
>>
>> Ubnt's AirFiber platform is great (as long as you don't need spatial
>> diversity), I think we can all agree it's high-grade. But many of their
>> other platforms suffer from the "let's develop random new products instead
>> of fixing major bugs" issue so I wouldn't call them high-grade.
>>
>> What is definitely lower grade:
>> -WRT54Gs in tupperware (still funny that this is how some WISPs started)
>> -anything Tranzeo
>> -Skypilot
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 3:21 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you get lower grade WISP equipment?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:51 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> it's all relative
>>>>
>>>> On 2/5/2019 10:28 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Most affected devices are high-grade WISP equipment"
>>>>
>>>> šŸ˜‚
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 9:23 AM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> am i the only one who shuts off discovery?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 8:25 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it my imagination, or does that article veer off toward the end
>>>>>> into stuff that may not be Ubiquiti problems at all?  And from the
>>>>>> description of the problem, I don’t see how it would lead to radios being
>>>>>> ā€œdefacedā€, just used as an amplifier via Ubiquiti Discovery Protocol.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, February 4, 2019 7:00 PM
>>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Over 485, 000 Ubiquiti devices vulnerable to new
>>>>>> attack | ZDNet
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.zdnet.com/article/over-485000-ubiquiti-devices-vulnerable-to-new-attack/
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to