I don't see any Mikrotik stuff that's really any less expensive than the bottom end UBNT (I'm talking LiteBeams and NanoStation Locos here), but yeah, the Mikrotik prices are close enough that it doesn't make any difference.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 7:13 AM Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > I think Mikrotik is still less expensive on the low end. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> > *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Tuesday, February 5, 2019 10:26:53 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Over 485, 000 Ubiquiti devices vulnerable to new > attack | ZDNet > > Indeed... I think you could consider most of the airFiber products > high-grade. > > But most of that other stuff is relatively ancient at this point... if > companies like Tranzeo are even still in business, I can't imagine who is > still using it, or why. When it comes to price, I don't think there's > really anything that can beat the low end Ubiquiti stuff. > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 9:25 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> .....and knowing that our friends at Ubiquiti are on this list as well, I >> feel I should point out that they make a lot of useful products and that in >> spite of our trash talking it's likely that every single one of us has >> found a use for something Ubqiuiti in their network. >> >> And maybe that multipoint LTU thing will rock our socks when it comes out >> in like 16 more years. >> >> >> On 2/5/2019 10:18 PM, Bill Prince wrote: >> >> Hi we're Ubiquiti, and we don't suck nearly as bad as Tranzeo. >> >> -- >> bp >> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:13 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> SmartBridges >>> WaveNet IP >>> >>> I'm not saying Ubiquiti is "high grade", but it's higher than some. >>> It's not a Ceragon IP20, but it's certainly a contender for the highest of >>> the low grade. >>> >>> >>> On 2/5/2019 5:10 PM, Colin Stanners wrote: >>> >>> Ubnt's AirFiber platform is great (as long as you don't need spatial >>> diversity), I think we can all agree it's high-grade. But many of their >>> other platforms suffer from the "let's develop random new products instead >>> of fixing major bugs" issue so I wouldn't call them high-grade. >>> >>> What is definitely lower grade: >>> -WRT54Gs in tupperware (still funny that this is how some WISPs started) >>> -anything Tranzeo >>> -Skypilot >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 3:21 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Can you get lower grade WISP equipment? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:51 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> it's all relative >>>>> >>>>> On 2/5/2019 10:28 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "Most affected devices are high-grade WISP equipment" >>>>> >>>>> š >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 9:23 AM Steve Jones <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> am i the only one who shuts off discovery? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 8:25 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it my imagination, or does that article veer off toward the end >>>>>>> into stuff that may not be Ubiquiti problems at all? And from the >>>>>>> description of the problem, I donāt see how it would lead to radios >>>>>>> being >>>>>>> ādefacedā, just used as an amplifier via Ubiquiti Discovery Protocol. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza >>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, February 4, 2019 7:00 PM >>>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> >>>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Over 485, 000 Ubiquiti devices vulnerable to new >>>>>>> attack | ZDNet >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.zdnet.com/article/over-485000-ubiquiti-devices-vulnerable-to-new-attack/ >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
