+150
The VLAN configuration on Mikrotik switches is almost as confounding as
possible.
--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 3:59 PM Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Try a Mikrotik switch if you think the IgniteNet is bad.
>
> I had no problem figuring out VLANs on IgniteNet. *shrugs*
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Carl Peterson" <[email protected]>
> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 9, 2019 11:42:44 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] SFP Switch recomendation
>
> We are using a few Ignite fusion fiber switches. Big complaint is that
> there is some strange incompatibility with 844GEs where it will sometimes
> cause the 844GE to reset its WAN VLAN settings if the ignite switch gets
> power cycled. Not sure if this has anything to do with ignite, but it
> doesn't happen with any other switch we have tried.
>
> VLAN settings are also mind bogglingly stupid. It can do most things
> except adding two tags, but the way it is configured makes zero sense.
>
> Power/heat and dimensions are all good.
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:23 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> We primarily use the HP Procurve J9803A (I think theyre called Office
>> Connect or something now) With LACP for bonding our 2+0 SAF links. We have
>> a site going in that will have three bonded links so I need at least 6 SFP.
>> The new name of these also changed the corm factor, theyre deeper and wont
>> fit in some of our enclosures.
>>
>> We dont do much with our switches beyond VLAN and LACP.
>>
>> Whats a comparable option with the less then 10 inch depth but still
>> rackmount that wont take issue with HP LACP on the other side of the link
>> if that matters? Ive heard good/bad on the mikrotik switches. These
>> currently only need up to 2gbps aggregate, but that will probably change
>> over time. Im not opposed to full SFP, but on our CCR we have a coup SFP
>> gigabit copper that are flaky, I dont know if thats a mikrotik thing or a
>> copper SFP thing
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Carl Peterson
>
> *PORT NETWORKS*
>
> 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553
>
> Baltimore, MD 21202
>
> (410) 637-3707
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
