Which is one of the main reasons I won't touch them with a 10ft pole.. configuring L2 VLAN's should *not* be that difficult. They have had years to improve it.. and it still sucks.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:26 PM Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > +150 > > The VLAN configuration on Mikrotik switches is almost as confounding as > possible. > > > -- > bp > part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 3:59 PM Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Try a Mikrotik switch if you think the IgniteNet is bad. >> >> I had no problem figuring out VLANs on IgniteNet. *shrugs* >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Carl Peterson" <[email protected]> >> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]> >> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 9, 2019 11:42:44 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] SFP Switch recomendation >> >> We are using a few Ignite fusion fiber switches. Big complaint is that >> there is some strange incompatibility with 844GEs where it will sometimes >> cause the 844GE to reset its WAN VLAN settings if the ignite switch gets >> power cycled. Not sure if this has anything to do with ignite, but it >> doesn't happen with any other switch we have tried. >> >> VLAN settings are also mind bogglingly stupid. It can do most things >> except adding two tags, but the way it is configured makes zero sense. >> >> Power/heat and dimensions are all good. >> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:23 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> We primarily use the HP Procurve J9803A (I think theyre called Office >>> Connect or something now) With LACP for bonding our 2+0 SAF links. We have >>> a site going in that will have three bonded links so I need at least 6 SFP. >>> The new name of these also changed the corm factor, theyre deeper and wont >>> fit in some of our enclosures. >>> >>> We dont do much with our switches beyond VLAN and LACP. >>> >>> Whats a comparable option with the less then 10 inch depth but still >>> rackmount that wont take issue with HP LACP on the other side of the link >>> if that matters? Ive heard good/bad on the mikrotik switches. These >>> currently only need up to 2gbps aggregate, but that will probably change >>> over time. Im not opposed to full SFP, but on our CCR we have a coup SFP >>> gigabit copper that are flaky, I dont know if thats a mikrotik thing or a >>> copper SFP thing >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Carl Peterson >> >> *PORT NETWORKS* >> >> 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 >> >> Baltimore, MD 21202 >> >> (410) 637-3707 >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
