Maybe the trend is accurate, but I don’t think you can do network planning 
based on GB/mo because what matters is peak traffic levels.  It used to be peak 
traffic was Monday morning when everyone got to work and opened their email.  
Now it’s 8-9pm when everyone is streaming video.

 

The other factor is video streams (and to a certain extent software downloads) 
use more bandwidth if you have a faster connection.  People are not cranking up 
the video quality dial from 480 to 720 to 1080 to 2160, they may not even 
appreciate the extra pixels they are seeing.  It just happens automagically 
because their connection allows it.

 

Perhaps this doesn’t matter because monthly data usage and peak bandwidth are 
correlated.  Same reason mobile network operators charge by gigabytes per 
month, it’s easier to track and the people who use the most data probably are 
the heaviest users at peak times.  Kind of unfair to people who game, watch TV, 
or download software in the middle of the night.  But that’s why the satellite 
Internet guys give you “bonus bytes” in the middle of the night.

 

I am still amazed that the FTTH providers here report customers use about the 
same data usage per customer as we see on our bandwidth constrained WISP 
network.  If I could give every customer gigabit or even 100 Mbps, a lot of 
their video streams would automagically jump to 20 Mbps as their kids watch My 
Little Pony in 4K UHD on their iPads.  Of course everyone in the house has 
their own video stream going on their own device.  No more whole family sitting 
in front of the living room TV watching the same show.  Even the kids have 
their own iPad and watch different cartoons.

 

 

From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2019 8:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Future FTTH bandwidth usage standard

 

Here's a study from Cisco forecasting 26% worldwide compound annual growth in 
IP traffic through 2022, and 21% for North America:

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/white-paper-c11-741490.html#_Toc532256789

I'm currently seeing 3mbps on average per FTTH household at peak traffic time.  
Chuck was saying 4 earlier....so we're in the same ballpark.  Allow at least a 
gig of overhead so your gig customer can get a gig when he actually wants/needs 
it.

We've been around 25% or so CAGR on bandwidth for a long time, but it varies on 
individual years from 15% to 100%.  I think it was a year in the early 2010's 
where we had the 100%.

-Adam



On 8/8/2019 9:23 PM, Chris Fabien wrote:

Mark, I'm working on a grant application and they are wanting to see proof (and 
a PE stamp) on the design that it will meet performance requirements for X 
years. I'm very comfortable with GPON at a 32 split or less being fine for 
probably at least 8+ years.  Just was asking if there is an industry standard 
way of calculating this or if everyone doesn't worry about it. I suppose it 
would be much more relevant if we were proposing a VDSL system instead of FTTH. 

 

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:36 PM Mark - Myakka Technologies <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Chris,

Does it really matter?  If you are AE you get 1GB per customer dedicated.  Not 
too hard or expensive to to bump that to 10GB per customer dedicated.  GPON 
does 2.5Gbps per pon usually shared by 32 customers.  New 10 Gbps PON will do 
10 per pon or I've even heard that they can do 40Gbps per pon using different 
wave lengths.

Our system has been up and running for 6+ years.  I've had to upgrade switches 
and routers.  Even had to upgrade to sfp+ uplink cards on one of my fiber 
systems.  Haven't had to touch GPON cards or customer ONT's.  In my system I 
see the 2.5Gbps PON lasting for many many years unless something drastic 
happens.  


--
Best regards,
Mark                             <mailto:[email protected]> mailto:[email protected]

Myakka Technologies, Inc.
 <http://www.Myakka.com> www.Myakka.com

------

Thursday, August 8, 2019, 6:34:06 PM, you wrote:

        
Is there any standard or common rule of thumb to design for future usage when 
designing a FTTH deployment? As in, we estimate average usage per sub to be 
2Mbps now and increase by 40% per year. The intent being to certify that your 
design will meet demand for say 10 years.

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





 

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to