DIagraming it,I see you would need two versions. A cambium power out version and a ubnt power out version... or it would need a jumper to select output.
Another fun product would be a standard to cambium module in APC style. We use the crossover cables, but would love something cleaner. On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:53 AM Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote: > Yes, the Tycon one. It's worked really well for us. They make a 24 and > 48v version. We just run it off of a 10000ma/h power bank with multiple > USB Ports. I just use a crossover dongle from Monoprice if I need to > reverse polarity (Old FSK/450 SM's). > https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=5088 It crosses all 4 pairs, but > since the Ethernet is all auto sensing now, that doesn't matter. > > On 12/3/2019 8:42 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > Oh is that a Tycon PoE? > > The old Motorola dongle definitely will fry a Nanostation. Maybe your > aftermarket PoE is better in that respect. > > > On 12/2/2019 8:57 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > > I just tried the experiment with a used M2 that I had around and was > willing to sacrifice. The LED on the POE-24iR-CI was off, probably > indicating a short. I only left it plugged in for maybe 30 seconds. > Afterward I plugged the Nanostation into a Ubiquiti POE and it powers up. > Not sure if this means it is OK, or it is partially fried and cannot be > relied upon long term, or would have been fried if I had left it plugged in > longer. > > > > I am trying to decide if this is a truck roll and new radio situation, or > a mail the customer a new POE situation. > > > > (The story behind this is customer A buys the house of customer B and is > moving in. Customer B had Nanostations from a shop building to the house > because of line of sight issues. Customer B did not leave the Ubiquiti > POE. Customer A goes to his old house and brings the Cambium POE to the > new house and plugs it in.) > > > > > > *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com><af-boun...@af.afmug.com> > <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Monday, December 2, 2019 7:39 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com><af@af.afmug.com> > <af@af.afmug.com> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] will reverse POE fry an M5 Nanostation? > > > > I would guess not, but it could be... > > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 7:26 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm guessing you're right. Nanostations are cheap enough that I would not > expect them to have reverse polarity protection. > > > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > > On 12/2/2019 5:21 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > > I have a customer who plugged an M series Nanostation Loco into a reverse > polarity POE intended for a Cambium SM. (long story) > > > > Anybody know if this means the Nanostation is fried? I’m guessing yes. > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- Carl Peterson *PORT NETWORKS* 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 Baltimore, MD 21202 (410) 637-3707
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
