The whole point from 45's point of view is to make money for his next
venture (whatever that is). He solicited donations to the tune of over
$210 million (last I heard), of which he's spent around $10 million
actually bringing his baseless complaints before courts (and only in the
swing states). It's a money grab, and baiting the base. That's all it is.
I am curious what stunt he is going to pull on January 20.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 12/8/2020 5:21 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I just read the federal judge's order on the Michigan "Kraken" lawsuit.
Among the various points she makes:
* The evidence offered is sworn testimony of belief that something
could have happened. Belief is not evidence.
* A US Court has no authority to provide the relief requested by the
plaintiff: A court can't order a state to change it's election results.
* Under the 11th amendment of the US Constitution you can't sue a
state in a federal court.
* Most of the same claims have already been brought to state courts
and already dismissed.
* The point is moot because you say election tampering was immediately
apparent, but waited 3 weeks to file a suit --after results were
already certified.
Any one of those reasons was enough to dismiss. Even to a non-lawyer
it seems like this never had a chance. Why did they bother? Was it
more about putting on the show? Was it, "the client wanted it so we
did it"?
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
