i love it when the left suffers their own consequences, makes me giggle. the chickens are coming home to roost, and its only just begun. Its sexy because there is so much video now that everytime a leftist complains about the sour grapes or utter stupidity, its simple to retort with video footage of them doing the exact same thing, only with the left, they normally added violence and destruction with it. And not to mention, trump gets to take credit for every good thing that biden does, just like obama did with trump. and the cake is, joe dumped bernie like a fat bar chic when the sun rise right after he used him. laughing at bernie and the bernie bros gets almost sad watching them get turned out over and over
and if team trump pulls off this constitutionally correct nonsense, we get to shoot each other without the pesky criminal justice system getting in the way of a necessary culling, so thats a win for everybody On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:04 AM Mark - Myakka Technologies <[email protected]> wrote: > Adam, > > Why bother, the big question. Trump lost this election. Were there > shenanigans, maybe, it doesn't matter. All this this jumping up and > down by Trump and his lawyers is a game. They know Joe is going to be > next president, no court is going to over turn the voting process. > > This is personal for Trump. For four years all he heard was he > cheated and was an illegitimate president. You may belive that or you > may not believe that, but it doesn't matter. He did his four > years and history will judge his presidency like it always does. > > Trump and his pals want to past on the gift of being called an > illegitimate president to Biden. So, they are working very hard to > make sure 50% of the country thinks Biden stole this election. > > > > -- > Best regards, > Mark mailto:[email protected] > > Myakka Technologies, Inc. > www.Myakka.com > > ------ > > Tuesday, December 8, 2020, 8:21:48 AM, you wrote: > > AM> I just read the federal judge's order on the Michigan "Kraken" lawsuit. > > AM> Among the various points she makes: > > AM> * The evidence offered is sworn testimony of belief that something > could > AM> have happened. Belief is not evidence. > > AM> * A US Court has no authority to provide the relief requested by the > AM> plaintiff: A court can't order a state to change it's election results. > > AM> * Under the 11th amendment of the US Constitution you can't sue a state > AM> in a federal court. > > AM> * Most of the same claims have already been brought to state courts and > AM> already dismissed. > > AM> * The point is moot because you say election tampering was immediately > AM> apparent, but waited 3 weeks to file a suit --after results were > already > AM> certified. > > AM> Any one of those reasons was enough to dismiss. Even to a non-lawyer > it > AM> seems like this never had a chance. Why did they bother? Was it more > AM> about putting on the show? Was it, "the client wanted it so we did > it"? > > > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
