A couple months back, wasn't someone on this list speculating whether Covid-19 could be spread via flatus and whether some people might need to wear a second mask?
And now we have Rudy Tooty. -----Original Message----- From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Robert Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 10:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: The Kraken has missing tentacles As always, follow the money, as of last week, over $200 million raised with a note in the donation page that the funds can be used for other purposes besides contesting the election. On 12/8/20 7:03 AM, Mark - Myakka Technologies wrote: > Adam, > > Why bother, the big question. Trump lost this election. Were > there shenanigans, maybe, it doesn't matter. All this this jumping > up and down by Trump and his lawyers is a game. They know Joe is > going to be next president, no court is going to over turn the voting process. > > This is personal for Trump. For four years all he heard was he > cheated and was an illegitimate president. You may belive that or you > may not believe that, but it doesn't matter. He did his four > years and history will judge his presidency like it always does. > > Trump and his pals want to past on the gift of being called an > illegitimate president to Biden. So, they are working very hard to > make sure 50% of the country thinks Biden stole this election. > > > > -- > Best regards, > Mark mailto:[email protected] > > Myakka Technologies, Inc. > www.Myakka.com > > ------ > > Tuesday, December 8, 2020, 8:21:48 AM, you wrote: > > AM> I just read the federal judge's order on the Michigan "Kraken" lawsuit. > > AM> Among the various points she makes: > > AM> * The evidence offered is sworn testimony of belief that something > AM> could have happened. Belief is not evidence. > > AM> * A US Court has no authority to provide the relief requested by > AM> the > AM> plaintiff: A court can't order a state to change it's election results. > > AM> * Under the 11th amendment of the US Constitution you can't sue a > AM> state in a federal court. > > AM> * Most of the same claims have already been brought to state > AM> courts and already dismissed. > > AM> * The point is moot because you say election tampering was > AM> immediately apparent, but waited 3 weeks to file a suit --after > AM> results were already certified. > > AM> Any one of those reasons was enough to dismiss. Even to a > AM> non-lawyer it seems like this never had a chance. Why did they > AM> bother? Was it more about putting on the show? Was it, "the client > wanted it so we did it"? > > > > -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
