I laugh and laugh about libiots exposing themselves as the hateful bigots
they really are whenever a right winger catches covid. I laugh even more
when they recover quickly and move on like the vast majority of those
infected with covid. Like right now, we have 6.1 million diagnosed cases
active, which is over 30 million active cases per the god faucis numbers of
5x more undiagnosed for every diagnosed, and we all know god fauci is god,
so that number is a fact, since gods dont lie and are never wrong.

CDC vaccine guidance states that those who have recovered are exempt from
vaccination due to immunity since there is such a short initial supply due
to FDA delays in approvals,

The CNN gods are really stressing that we are having 200,000 active cases
diagnosed daily, and its got zero to do with the fact that we do the most
testing on the planet, god sanjay gupta sad so, so that is a fact.

Whats that say?

since god CNN says 200k cases per day, and god fauci says its 5x that for 1
million cases a day, and god CDC says you are exempt from vaccination if
recovered due to immunity. by christmas there will be 17 million either
recovered or nearly recovered, on top of the 9 million recovered, whch per
god fauci is 45 million for a total of 62 million immune by christmas, by
the gods on words out of 332 million (18.6 percent of the population immune
before the second dose of the fist vaccine is delivered)

What it says is, democrats arent getting themselves tested because theyre
too worried about the narrative theyre trying to uphold, even though many
happen to go radio silent for two weeks all the time. Or they would
probably stop exposing their bigoted hate.


The above nonsense, where the left consistently spouts god facts then
directly contradicts themselves so that cultists like jaime lash out, as
designed (tds being similar to rabies, future PETs will be a fun collegiate
study) is exactly why close to 70 million people have no interest in
believing what said leftists have to say about an election where statistics
dont support the outcomes even with the massive variables applied. To the
point where a larger percentage of the nation than was active in the fight
to clear up the england thing and bring the confederacy back into the fray
are willing to accept the use of a constitutionally "legal" maneuver and
deal with the guaranteed violence that will follow. This all
happenning while we sit on a billion firearms and trillions of rounds of
ammunition, majority in the possession of the referenced 70 million.

All it would have taken to avoid this from the get go was actual, real
transparency. There is no reason voter rolls shouldnt be cleaned every
couple years. Theres no reason mail out ballots needed to be sent out
haphazardly, there are enough states where nitwits keep pointing out do
mail in voting (as said nitwits conflate mail in voting with mass mailout
ballots) , Theres no reason that ballot counting shouldnt be open to public
gallery viewing and under audio visual surveillance, There absolutely no
reason voting machines shouldnt be forensically audited every single time
theyre used.

actual transparency would have gone a long way. But, like I sad, we need a
good culling anyway Im good with any outcome. even if my guy finally
accepts his loss, its only two years that its an issue anyway, And we can
tie everything up in courts that we want anyway for that long, using the
lefts precedent (chickens coming home to roost)

Instead of ulcering out and damaging more synapse like my texan friend
here, sit back and laugh because this shit is funny as hell, both sides
equally. Like watching a bunch of fat women fight over an old jelly donut
on a trampoline. Get the laughs while you can, because if my team gets
their way, there will be gunfire in the streets and aside my my reeducation
facility, that wont be funny at all

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:25 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

> A couple months back, wasn't someone on this list speculating whether
> Covid-19 could be spread via flatus and whether some people might need to
> wear a second mask?
>
> And now we have Rudy Tooty.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Robert
> Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 10:09 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: The Kraken has missing tentacles
>
> As always, follow the money, as of last week, over $200 million raised
> with a note in the donation page that the funds can be used for other
> purposes besides contesting the election.
>
> On 12/8/20 7:03 AM, Mark - Myakka Technologies wrote:
> > Adam,
> >
> > Why  bother,  the  big question.  Trump lost this election.  Were
> > there shenanigans,  maybe, it doesn't matter.  All this this jumping
> > up and down by Trump and his lawyers is a game.  They know Joe is
> > going to be next president, no court is going to over turn the voting
> process.
> >
> > This  is  personal  for  Trump.   For  four  years all he heard was he
> > cheated and was an illegitimate president.  You may belive that or you
> > may  not  believe  that,  but it doesn't matter.  He did his four
> > years and history will judge his presidency like it always does.
> >
> > Trump  and  his  pals  want  to  past  on  the gift of being called an
> > illegitimate  president  to  Biden.  So, they are working very hard to
> > make sure 50% of the country thinks Biden stole this election.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >   Mark                            mailto:[email protected]
> >
> > Myakka Technologies, Inc.
> > www.Myakka.com
> >
> > ------
> >
> > Tuesday, December 8, 2020, 8:21:48 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > AM> I just read the federal judge's order on the Michigan "Kraken"
> lawsuit.
> >
> > AM> Among the various points she makes:
> >
> > AM> * The evidence offered is sworn testimony of belief that something
> > AM> could have happened.  Belief is not evidence.
> >
> > AM> * A US Court has no authority to provide the relief requested by
> > AM> the
> > AM> plaintiff: A court can't order a state to change it's election
> results.
> >
> > AM> * Under the 11th amendment of the US Constitution you can't sue a
> > AM> state in a federal court.
> >
> > AM> * Most of the same claims have already been brought to state
> > AM> courts and already dismissed.
> >
> > AM> * The point is moot because you say election tampering was
> > AM> immediately apparent, but waited 3 weeks to file a suit --after
> > AM> results were already certified.
> >
> > AM> Any one of those reasons was enough to dismiss.  Even to a
> > AM> non-lawyer it seems like this never had a chance.  Why did they
> > AM> bother?  Was it more about putting on the show?  Was it, "the client
> wanted it so we did it"?
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to